www.sechistorical.org

Virtual Museum and Archive of the History of Financial Regulation

SEC HISTORICAL SOCIETY

Galleries

The Bright Image: The SEC, 1961-1973

An Economic Theory of Regulation Emerges
Facing a Challenge

From 1963 to 1973, the SEC addressed concerns about the commission rate structure, stock exchange membership rules, and problems created in processing stock sales created by the tremendous increases in market volume. Because these issues involved economic, not anti-fraud, concerns, the SEC faced a dilemma as it began to address these concerns.

SEC Regional Adminstrators Conference

The SEC had built its regulatory experience around the principles of fiduciary responsibility and full disclosure. It needed to develop an alternative approach to address economic concerns not resolved solely by resorting to principles of fiduciary duty or increased disclosure. The search for an economics-based theory of regulation would challenge the SEC throughout this entire period.

Relying on Section 19(b) of the 1934 Act, which allowed the SEC "to alter or supplement" registered stock exchange rules when "necessary or appropriate for the protection of investors or to insure fair dealing" including "fixing reasonable rates of commission," the SEC began to consider regulatory options. It took a cooperative approach in nudging the New York Stock Exchange to consider and then reform its own commission rate structure, membership rules and back-office procedures for processing stock transactions.

At the same time, a variety of private litigants initiated suit against the NYSE, challenging its fixed commission rate structure under the federal anti-trust laws. Central to the plaintiffs' complaints was an economic argument that promoted competition as a way to reduce costs to investors and promote market efficiency. While the appeals court dismissed the case in Kaplan v Lehman (1967), Chief Justice Earl Warren dissented from the Supreme Court's denial of review. Chairman Cohen read Warren's dissent as a warning to the SEC that it had better get involved in the regulation of commission rates, lest the anti-trust provisions of federal law preempt the possibility of future SEC regulation.

<<Previous | Next >>


Related Museum Resources
Papers
April 29, 1965
[image] (pdf) (Courtesy of Stephen A. Zeff)
March 12, 1966
[image] (pdf) (Government Records)
May 24, 1966
[image] (pdf) (Courtesy of Stephen A. Zeff)
October 5, 1966
[image] (pdf) (Courtesy of Stephen A. Zeff)
1967
[transcript] (pdf) (Government Records)
February 27, 1967
[transcript] (pdf) (Courtesy of the Lyndon B. Johnson Library and Museum)
February 28, 1967
[transcript] (pdf) (Courtesy of the Lyndon B. Johnson Library and Museum)
February 28, 1967
[transcript] (pdf) (Courtesy of the Lyndon B. Johnson Library and Museum)
1968
[transcript] (pdf) (Government Records)
January 29, 1968
[document] (pdf) (Courtesy of Libbey Sussan)
February 20, 1968
[document] (pdf) (Courtesy of David Ratner)
March 7, 1968
[image] (pdf) (Courtesy of Stephen A. Zeff)
Photos
1967

(front row) Donald J. Stocking, William Green, Francis Wheat, Hugh Owens, Manuel Cohen, Hamer Budge, Richard Smith, Thomas B. Hart, Arthur E. Pennekamp; (second row) Orval L. DuBois, W. Victor Rodin, David L. Ratner, Andrew Barr, Mahlon M. Frankhauser, Gerald E. Boltz, James E. Dowd, Alexander J. Brown, Jr., James E. Newton, Richard V. Bandler, Solomon Freedman, Irving M. Pollack, Roger S. Foster, Loughlin F. McHugh, Alfred Letzler, Walter P. North; (third row) Ralph L. Bell, Frank J. Donaty, Harry Pollack, Charles E. Shreve, Thomas W. Rae, David Ferber, Philip A. Loomis, Jr., Edmund H. Worthy, Robert H. Bagley, John A. Dudley, Eugene H. Rotberg, Lindsay J. Millard, Aaron Levy, Ernest L. Dessecker, William E. Becker

(Courtesy of Frances Green Oliver )
Oral Histories
19 June 2007

Robert Davenport

19 June 2002

Richard Smith

Video
1971

Can Regulatory Agencies Protect the Consumer?

(with permission of the American Enterprise Institute and courtesy of the National Archives and Records Administration)

Mr. Cohen and Dr. Stigler debate the Federal government's role in the free enterprise system, the power of regulatory agencies, and the effect of regulatory agencies on consumers. Questions are presented by Louis Dombrowski, Chicago Tribune; Chester Earle, American University; Roger Cramton, Administrative Conference of the United States; Walter Wingo, U.S. News and World Report; and Joost Polak, Newhouse Newspapers.

  • Video (wmv | 67 minutes)

(copyright) 2002-2010 Securities and Exchange Commission Historical Society

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy